http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10963
David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dc...@prosentient.com.au
--- Comment #14 from David Cook <dc...@prosentient.com.au> ---
I really like the idea for this patch, as it will mean that we only need to
manage the default framework for adding/modifying MARC fields and subfields
when doing a fresh install.
However...it seems to me that it is completely copying the subfields as is
which is different from what we're currently doing. If you run the following
SQL:
"select group_concat(frameworkcode),hidden,tagfield,tagsubfield from
marc_subfield_structure group by concat(tagfield,tagsubfield,hidden);"
You'll notice that the other sample frameworks hide different fields that the
default framework displays.
I think we can still keep the methodology set out in these frameworks, but
maybe we want to come up with some criteria (or copy the existing criteria) for
hiding subfields/fields in these other sample frameworks.
Otherwise, libraries are just going to have to customize every framework and
then it becomes pointless having "other" sample frameworks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
_______________________________________________
Koha-bugs mailing list
Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org
http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs
website : http://www.koha-community.org/
git : http://git.koha-community.org/
bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
