http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11130
--- Comment #3 from Mirko Tietgen <mi...@abunchofthings.net> --- (In reply to mathieu saby from comment #2) > Maybe it is in ccl.properties, but I believe it would be a bad idea to > follow it on this point ;-) > The 2 information should be in different indexes. In Unimarc, we use pl for > 210 (the same as 260) and Country-publication for 102$a field (if I remember > well) for the country. At the moment, it is 008/15-17 and ALL 260 subfields. I'm not trying to make it worse but better, but based on what is in that file. ;) And I would like to get 260$e (Place of manufacture) out of the index. But perhaps you are right, ignoring what ccl.properties says and instead setting up an index just for 260$a would be a better idea. Maybe others have an opinion on that? > By the way, the "pl" index is completely useless for the average user in an > academic or public library, at least according to my experience. Because > I've never seen a reader looking for "a book published in London", or "All > the books published in Paris". > I think it's more a librarian-centered information. We have a lot of video material and a search for »movies from $country« is very likely. »movies published in London« not so much I guess. ;D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/