http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10869
--- Comment #55 from M. de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- (In reply to M. de Rooy from comment #54) > The questions on order level actually pertain to basket level also. If we > delete a basket, we do warn the user that he will lose his items. But he > does not have a choice between "Delete basket and orders" and "Delete > baskets, orders and items". > Is this getting too complicated now? We are/have been discussing deleting acquisition information on several reports now. The constraint on itemnumber in aqorders_items did not reach consensus (bug 11617). Please note also bug 8991. I think we should move the old completed baskets (with orders) to an archive table and offer the possibility to delete that too. What do you think? With respect to the angle of this report, I think it is somewhat strange to delete biblio and item records but leave an order (read: order line) in cancelled status with a Deleted bibliographic record, can't find title-line. There is much more information on a biblio record and we do not hesitate to delete it (with a copy in deletedbiblio) but we keep a deleted order (line) without title. Do we need some more community consensus on how to move such things further in Acquistion before deciding on several individual patches? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
