http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=11078
--- Comment #67 from M. de Rooy <m.de.r...@rijksmuseum.nl> --- QA Comment: Thanks Doug for all adjustments. As you can see, I still saw a reason to add a followup to cover some (very) exceptional cases. Just for the record: I would prefer (next time) to keep the original patch with signoff and just add QA follow-ups. But no reason to do that now anymore! I would like to suggest the following route now: Please apply both patches and test again (hopefully last time). You could add your signoff on the second patch. Since we had Martin for the signoff and considering the second patch as a QA follow-up, I will pass QA on this report after receiving your confirmation. Note that we have no warnings too from the QA tools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
