http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=10825
--- Comment #20 from Mason James <m...@kohaaloha.com> --- (In reply to M. Tompsett from comment #16) > Magnus, the first one does not account for Nicole's comment #12. However, > since I do not know the validity of the suggestion, I coded a counter-patch > which does account for it as noted in comment #14. > > You apply one or the other -- not both. > > The first patch will only put out enumchron if enumchron is defined, and if > it is not defined, then it will consider putting out serialseq. > > The second patch will put out both enumchron and serialseq if they are > different. And it will only put them out if they are defined. > > Hope this clears that up. Mark's patch sounds better than my patch, lets use that one... i will mark my patch 'obsolete' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
