http://bugs.koha-community.org/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=12287
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Druart <jonathan.dru...@biblibre.com> --- (In reply to Kyle M Hall from comment #5) > I don't think so. That could cause future regressions if new found statuses > are added. For example, there used to be a found status of 'F' for > 'Finished' ( from before the existence of the old_reserves table iirc ). We > never want to include any type of found hold when calculating a new hold's > priority, set there is no need to list everything as a special case. Looking at the code in C4/Reserves.pm and reserves/*, the 'found' value is often compared to 'W' or 'T'. Both values are listed explicitly. That's why I supposed it is safer to use the same way. I added a small comment in the line (in order to get return if someone grep found.*W.*T) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes. _______________________________________________ Koha-bugs mailing list Koha-bugs@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-bugs website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
