Le 19/11/2011 15:21, Ian Walls a écrit : > Marshall, > > > Ah, I think I may have misunderstood. I was interested in keeping > product and vendor separate, which it looks like you've done (but with > ergonomic fix to assume the common 1-1 relationship at first > selection). The case of having multiple vendors or multiple products > would introduce a much larger change in system complexity (going from 1 > to n always does), and I can't cite many examples where it'd be > relevant. +1 And I think it's very rare to have 2 vendors *at the same time* doing training/migration with X, then, having Y for support is uncommon but sometimes happend. What happend more frequently is to have some task sub-contracted by X to Y. For example, I know for sure we sub-contract sometimes development of new features to catalyst, and I'm almost sure we are not the only ones ;-)
-- Paul POULAIN http://www.biblibre.com Expert en Logiciels Libres pour l'info-doc Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
