Robin Sheat <ro...@catalyst.net.nz> > Op 16-11-12 08:53, MJ Ray schreef: > > Probably nothing. Is this mere aggregation, or are you planning to > > include Bootstrap dependencies into GPL2+ code? > > Assuming bootstrap is a JS/CSS library, when you include it into the > template, you're (I'm not a lawyer) linking in a way very much akin to > linking a C library I would think.
Really? Isn't this closer to use'ing a perl module than linking a C library? Unless we get into stuff like precompiling templates to include bits of Bootstrap. Anyone know the case law? After the awful GPL3 drafting process, I walked away from licensing theory a bit so I'm not 100% sure. Even if it was like C linking, that would move only koha-tmpl to GPL3+ (because it derives from both the GPL2+ perl parts of Koha and the AL2 Bootstrap), but the perl parts could remain GPL2+ without problem. Thanks, -- MJ Ray (slef), member of www.software.coop, a for-more-than-profit co-op. http://koha-community.org supporter, web and library systems developer. In My Opinion Only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html Available for hire (including development) at http://www.software.coop/ _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list Koha-devel@lists.koha-community.org http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
