Le 28/11/2012 15:30, Chris Nighswonger a écrit : > All QA members should already have been accessing the quality of > patches at least to the same degree as those doing generic sign-offs and > really to a greater degree. So as I say, the burden of '-s' is, indeed, > trivial. What is not-fun is that for string or really trivial changes, the QA is also trivial, and applying/signing/attaching the patch is "costly".
Jared, would you be OK to discard this "QA need a signature" for this kind of patch ? (reminder: now we have the patch complexity) -- Paul POULAIN - BibLibre http://www.biblibre.com Free & Open Source Softwares for libraries Koha, Drupal, Piwik, Jasper _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha-community.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel website : http://www.koha-community.org/ git : http://git.koha-community.org/ bugs : http://bugs.koha-community.org/
