> > I'll admit that it is nice to have the larger icons for the kids ( to > this end one of my librarians has asked me to increase the font > size on > the opac ). So, in my opinion, it would be best to have variable > padding with the icons. I just don't look forward to trying to code > that. I think the best way would be to have it statically set. That > way we would save the time it takes to parse the image to find it's > width. > > On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 15:14 -0500, Galen Charlton wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Michael Hafen >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think it would be best to standardize on a size for these >>> images, so >>> that the css can be set once and look right. >> >> I would prefer that we accommodate different sizes for the icons >> rather than settle for just one "standard" size. I'm not sure how >> many libraries are using the liblime-kids set, but the icons in it >> are >> larger than npl or bridge to support a common design pattern for >> childrens' OPACs. >> >> Regards,
i agree with Galen here. Michael, i guess the quick-fix for you, is to change your templates/ css for the bridge-set dimensions i wonder if the padding could be changed to a '%' value, rather than a 'px' value... could we have some magical auto-boundary handling here? <li title="" style="margin: 0.4em 0pt; padding: 3px 0pt 3px 30px; list-style-image: none; list-style-position: outside; list-style- type: none; background-image: url(/opac-tmpl/prog/itemtypeimg/bridge/ book.gif); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: 0pt 50%;"> Centerville (1)</li> _______________________________________________ Koha-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.koha.org/mailman/listinfo/koha-devel
