Le 24/09/2013 18:44, Galen Charlton a écrit : > Thanks for clarifying. And I think that this example makes it clear > that this particular voting scheme should never be used again for > conference selection, as I can't see how such an outcome could possibly > be justified absent an explicit "none of the above" option.
I really liked last year way of voting. Let's suppose you're 4 options: one in EU, one in america, one in north africa (tunisia), one in NZ. Someone from France, could be happy to vote: * #1 EU, 4 points (very cheap !) * #2 Tunisia, 3 points (cheap) * no other options, because I would really like to got to the conference, and would not be able to pay NZ or america. But of course, that makes much more sense with more than 2 options. That we don't have this year. -- Paul POULAIN - Associé-gérant Tel : (33) 4 91 81 35 08 http://www.biblibre.com Logiciels Libres pour les bibliothèques et les centres de documentation _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha