For most of the vendors in the table, development is focused on one strategic product. In some cases they may also have some other projects, so that whole number may not be devoted to the main ILS. The column of interest is the one for “Dev” counting only developers, not the total headcount of the company. That’s the one for which I am trying to derive a comparable figure for Koha. I know that Catalyst is quite a large company involved with many projects, but I’m specifically interested in the personnel resources allocated to Koha.
-marshall From: Chris Cormack [mailto:ch...@bigballofwax.co.nz] Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2015 3:23 PM To: Marshall Breeding Cc: Brendan Gallagher; Tomas Cohen Arazi; koha@lists.katipo.co.nz; koha-de...@lists.koha-community.org Subject: Re: [Koha-devel] [Koha] Koha development On 13 February 2015 at 10:14, Marshall Breeding <marshall.breed...@librarytechnology.org<mailto:marshall.breed...@librarytechnology.org>> wrote: Brendan, Some personnel FTE numbers from last year can be seen on the tables from the Library Systems Report: http://www.americanlibrariesmagazine.org/sites/americanlibrariesmagazine.org/files/content/Charts_MarshallBreeding.pdf The numbers are for the company overall, and not limited to efforts expended on specific products or projects. In that case for Catalyst there are 235 staff, of which 182 are devs Chris _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz http://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha
