Hi Heather, On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Hernandez, Heather <heather_hernan...@nps.gov> wrote:
> Hi, Pablo-- > > I'm not really sure what you're asking--we use the 001 for a unique > bibliographic control number, which for us is the OCLC record number. > We wish to have 001 as unique bibliographic control number, but our library have nothing to do with OCLC. Are you saying that you wish Koha could automatically generate a unique > control number in the 001? > Yes. > Would you use this differently from the Koha record number in the 999 $c > field? > Yes. In fact we already have a control number on old records because they come from a migration, and this numbers could overlap with biblionumber (999$c). That's why bug 9921 is not useful for us. We need on 001 a unique record number that is not equal neither with OCLC control number nor Koha's biblionumber. Cheers, Pablo _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha