it might be a silly question, but I believe, similar question has been asked in the forum before but I did not get clarified.
since "item type" is used for defining circulation rules, "Item Type" (952y) at "Item" level sounds good. What is the necessity of calling "Item type" (942c) at Record level instead of calling it as "record type". Circulation rules are defined for ITEMS which are associated with a RECORD. since record holds biblio detail, and items are meant for circulation, is it meaningful to call "item type" at record level? Is it necessary to define 942c? what happens only 952y exists? Kindly clarify me to understand this item type. with thanks Satish MV Librarian GEC Hassan Karnataka. _______________________________________________ Koha mailing list http://koha-community.org Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha