Hi Tasha

Bite your tongue! Fixing errors in old records kept me busy during the 2020 
lockdowns!

Honestly I think this would be a good idea, even if the interface only showed 
some kind of alert according to a (predefined) set of rules. The MARCEdit 
MARCValidator is a good example (it even reports on invalid tag indicators). As 
you say, we can always write SQL reports to pull individual (repeated) errors, 
but it would be nice to spot these 'live' too.

With kind regards from the Dalton McCaughey Library Team

Carlos Lopez

Dalton McCaughey Library | 29 College Crescent, Parkville, VICTORIA 3052
Ph: 03 9340 8888 ext.1 | libr...@dml.vic.edu.au | library.dmlibrary.org.au 

-----Original Message-----
From: Koha <koha-boun...@lists.katipo.co.nz> On Behalf Of Bales (US), Tasha R
Sent: Thursday, 3 November 2022 1:05 AM
To: koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Subject: [Koha] Ideas wanted for cataloging QA utilities

CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click 
links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content 
is safe.


Good morning,

I'm interested to know if anyone has developed tools to help copy catalogers 
quality check their work in real time.

For example, at a long-ago conference, I saw a librarian present Windows batch 
scripts they'd created to check cataloging in Millennium.  I don't recall the 
specifics, but for my purposes, I'd be interested in doing checks such as the 
following:


  *   Compare 260 to 008
  *   Check for the presence or absence of important fields in both bib and 
item record
  *   Check for agreement between item type and notforloan value

I could do the above with SQL, but I'm trying to get closer to first-time 
quality by catching the errors as they occur (maybe I could use jQuery to link 
a prebuilt report that would check the bib I'm currently viewing?).

Options might be Jupyter notebooks, or jQuery.  This is my first time working 
with a staff client that is a web application, so I'm not sure what is 
realistically possible or what anyone has already come up with (Google is not 
helping).

Any food for thought is welcome.  Even if I only "caught" errors such as 
impossible publication dates (e.g., 2039, 202, etc.), that would be a help.

Thanks for your time and consideration,


Tasha Bales


_______________________________________________

Koha mailing list  
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://koha-community.org__;!!DVrgiXjqvl2yLjg!ZWXEShPXQpMgfNVPNXBmLGI1jXVHXieyFdvpzDpP9v1W5YBw2ROfyN_Un9bLWiEWrRktJE-VEiEVkXRKnleTpherYdgH$
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Unsubscribe: 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha__;!!DVrgiXjqvl2yLjg!ZWXEShPXQpMgfNVPNXBmLGI1jXVHXieyFdvpzDpP9v1W5YBw2ROfyN_Un9bLWiEWrRktJE-VEiEVkXRKnleTplSiTy28$
_______________________________________________

Koha mailing list  http://koha-community.org
Koha@lists.katipo.co.nz
Unsubscribe: https://lists.katipo.co.nz/mailman/listinfo/koha

Reply via email to