>From:                   "Mrs. Jela Jovanovic, Secretary General"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To:                     "National Journal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject:                Would Clinton Try to Assassinate Slobodan Milosevic?
>Date sent:              Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:37:03 +0100
>
>
>
>
>
>
>===========================
>The Committee for National Solidarity
>Tolstojeva 34, 11000 Belgrade, YU
>
>Would Clinton Try to Assassinate Slobodan Milosevic?
>
>Will Creating Anarchy in Other Nations Become American policy?
>By Mary Mostert, Analyst, Original Sources (www.originalsources.com)
>
>February 14, 2000
>
>One of my readers, T.V. Weber, who is very knowledgeable on what has and
>is happening in Kosovo, e-mailed me a question:
>
>
>In your February 8, 2000 article entitled "Is It Democracy or Anarchy that
>Clinton and Blair Demand in Europe? America Found About KLA the Hard
>Way
>in Kosovo" you end with the powerful paragraph: "Increasingly, it appears,
>if voters in other countries don't vote the way the White House wants them
>to vote, they are treated as enemies and either isolated, sanctioned or
>bombed. And where does that lead? Quite often to the kind of anarchy that
>now exists in Kosovo." My only question is: will this become domestic
>policy? I would write myself off as paranoid, however I have several
>friends in the mental health profession who insist that I am NOT suffering
>from that particular neurosis.
>
>My sister Roberta has a little saying about paranoia. "If someone really
>IS out to get you, you are not being paranoid for thinking someone is out
>to get you." We have this huge organization called the Central
>Intelligence Agency which has a budget of nearly $27 billion. We don't
>know how many people are employed there, nor do we know much about what
>the people there do. It's a secret. Would the CIA do things that might
>lead to anarchy in other countries, like assassinating people elected
>leaders of other nations, for instance? Would any NATO country do such a
>thing, do you suppose?
>
>Well, spying and spies may be changing since the fall of the Soviet Union,
>since the reason for the very existence of the CIA, which was created in
>1947 with the signing of the National Security Act by President Truman,
>was to coordinate the nation's intelligence activities. It was primarily
>concerned with the threat of Communism and the Soviet Union. For the last
>decade, of course, it has had to find other goals to justify the
>expenditure of that $27 billion. The British intelligence agency has had
>much the same problem.
>
>What appears to have happened is an expansion of intelligence activity in
>all kinds of areas and some of those areas have really bothered some of
>the spies working in the agencies. Richard Tomlinson, a former British
>Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) agent who had tried to tell the people
>of Great Britain what some of their money was being used for. In 1998 he
>said, in part, in an affidavit which was posted on the Internet to the
>horror of the intelligence community:
>(http://www.anaserve.com/~wethepeople/tomlin3.htm)
>
>
>In 1992, as the civil war in the former Yugoslavia became increasingly
>topical, I started to work primarily on operations in Serbia. During this
>time, I became acquainted with Dr Nicholas Bernard Frank FISHWICK, born
>1958, the MI6 officer who at the time was in charge of planning Balkan
>operations. During one meeting with Dr Fishwick, he casually showed to me
>a three-page document that on closer inspection turned out to be an
>outline plan to assassinate the Serbian leader President Slobodan
>Milosevic. The plan was fully typed, and attached to a yellow "minute
>board", signifying that this was a formal and accountable document. It
>will therefore still be in existence. Tomlinson named names, dates and
>places and added: "This plan contained a political justification for the
>assassination of Milosevic, followed by three outline proposals on how to
>achieve this objective." Last week the latest in a series of
>assassinations or near assassinations took place in Belgrade when the
>federal minister of defense Pavle Bulatovic was gunned down by someone who
>was able to "shoot with precision with an automatic rifle." The Bulatovic
>assassination came only three weeks after the murder in similar style of
>Zeljko Raznatovic, a militia leader and Milosovic supporter known as Arkan
>in the lobby of Belgrade's plush Intercontinental Hotel. In early October,
>on a lonely road south of Belgrade, a truck loaded with sand plowed into a
>convoy carrying Serbian opposition leader Vuk Draskovic and four others to
>a Sunday picnic. Only Draskovic survived. Draskovic supported Milosevic
>throughout the bombing and was critical of other minority party leaders
>for taking money offered to Milosevic opponents.
>
>Of course, the spin put on all these assassinations and assassination
>attempts is that they are all Milosevic's fault. For some reason we are
>all supposed to believe that Milosevic would hire assassins to kill his
>supporters and cabinet officers in highly public mafia style executions.
>
>Would our beloved CIA do such dastardly deeds? Well, apparently even the
>New York Times has its suspicions. In a front page story yesterday,
>entitled, "U.S. Victims of Chile's Coup: The Uncensored File" the Times
>reports that documents recently declassified by Clinton "make clear for
>the first time that the State Department concluded from almost the
>beginning that the Pinochet government had killed the men, Charles Horman,
>31, and Frank Teruggi, 24." Horman and Teruggi were Americans who
>supported the socialist government of Salvador Allende. Those documents
>indicate that the CIA and the Pentagon of collaborated with General
>Augusto Pinochet, who is now being accused of human rights violations, to
>get the two men killed.
>
>The Times reported: "U.S. intelligence may have played an unfortunate part
>in Horman's death," said one newly declassified memo. "At best, it was
>limited to providing or confirming information that helped motivate his
>murder by the government of Chile. At worst, U.S. intelligence was aware
>the government of Chile saw Horman in a rather serious light and U.S.
>officials did nothing to discourage the logical outcome of government of
>Chile paranoia." In 1980 the Government was forced to release these
>documents through the Freedom of Information Act. However, they were
>heavily censored in black ink, and appeared to clear the American and
>Chilean governments of any responsibility. Now that Clinton has released
>the total document, it is increasingly apparent that the CIA was involved
>in helping the Pinochet regime find the Americans, who were summarily
>executed by Pinochet's uniformed troops.
>
>On April 23, 1999 when three laser-guided bombs landed in Milosevic's
>bedroom, living room and dining room, the Serbs called it an
>"assassination attempt." Kenneth Bacon, Pentagon spokesman, when asked if
>the bombing of Milosevic's home was an assassination attempt, said that
>assassination of foreign leaders was not "US policy."
>
>I wrote in an analysis of the event
>(http://www.originalsources.com/OS4-99MQC/4-23-1999.1.html), "Of course,
>the reporter didn't ask what US policy is. He asked if the purpose of
>bombing Milosevic's home was to kill him. Bacon didn't answer that
>question. However, it is doubtful that the decision was made to bomb
>Milosevic's bedroom and living room to improve his health."
>
>So, to answer T.V.'s question, do I think Bill Clinton and Tony Blair are
>capable of adopting a policy which is DESIGNED to create anarchy in other
>countries? Yes. They are. I don't know if it is through sheer stupidity or
>by design, but it sure is obvious to me that Clinton's expressed
>determination to "get rid" of Slobodon Milosevic has simply moved from
>bombing his bedroom in April of 1999 to trying to create fear, distrust
>and internal wars among the Serbs who haven't figured it out yet.
>
>To comment: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>Secretary General
>Mrs. Jela Jovanovic
>Art  historian
>===========================
>


__________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

___________________________________

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________

Reply via email to