>from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>subject: Australian Politicians -US controlled

>From: Communist Party of Australia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>MIME-Version: 1.0
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>        "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>        "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>        "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>        "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: GUARDIAN ROUNDUP -- SEE INDEX
>
>GUARDIAN ROUNDUP -- SEE INDEX BELOW
>
>The following articles were published in "The Guardian", newspaper
>of the Communist Party of Australia in its issue of Wednesday,
>March 15, 2000. Contact address: 65 Campbell Street, Surry Hills.
>Sydney. 2010 Australia. Phone: (612) 9212 6855 Fax: (612) 9281 5795.
>CPA Central Committee: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>"The Guardian": <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Webpage: http://www.cpa.org.au>
>Subscription rates on request.
>******************************
>
>INDEX:
>
>A Government of Liars (Editorial)
>
>Sometimes the statements of government leaders can be passed
>off as propaganda or merely expressions of opinion but these hardly
>cover many of the statements of the Howard Government.
>
>Readers will recall the assertions of some years ago about Howard
>being "honest John". This could be passed off as propaganda but
>his statements that "no worker will be worse off" and that the
>"GST would never, ever be introduced" hardly fall into that
>category.
>
>His statements of concern about reconciliation with the
>Aboriginal people made at the time of his Government's re-
>election in 1998 have not been borne out by subsequent events.
>ATSIC's funding has been cut back substantially and some aspects
>of its authority have been taken out of its control and
>administration entirely with control given to Howard Government
>Ministers -- Herron and Wooldridge.
>
>Now we have the statement of Communications Minister Richard
>Alston that the sacking of thousands of technicians by Telstra,
>"need not" result in any loss of services to the bush (what about
>the cities and towns?). This is nothing more than a dishonest
>cover-up of what Telstra management is doing.
>
>The claim that the Government, as the majority shareholder of
>Telstra, cannot do anything about these sackings is another lie.
>Of course the Government's representatives on the Board of
>Telstra could instruct the Board to do what it is told.
>
>The fact is that the Howard Government is hell-bent on the total
>privatisation of Telstra, but in circumstances where it knows
>that it cannot get privatisation legislation passed in the Senate
>it is quite prepared to see Telstra dismembered by way of
>contracting out and other means so as to give its private
>enterprise opponents maximum opportunity to pick up the pieces.
>
>Telstra's CEO, Ziggy Switkowski and others on the Telstra board,
>who also make it clear that they want to privatise Telstra
>completely, are out to sabotage this prize piece of public
>property if they cannot clear the way to have it privatised.
>
>It's a disgusting scenario. These people are no less than
>traitors to Australia's national interests which can only be
>defined as the interests of the majority of the people, the
>majority being opposed to the privatisation of Telstra.
>
>The big corporations, mostly foreign, which are out to grab the
>whole of Telstra do not care a fig for the interests of the
>Australian people. Their interest is about profits for
>shareholders.
>
>They make it clear that this is their priority responsibility,
>not the needs of the Australian people. Community interests used
>to be enshrined in the charters of publicly owned services such
>as Telstra, Australia Post, and the Commonwealth Bank. But that
>has all but vanished as a result of corporatisation and
>privatisation by both Coalition and ALP Governments.
>
>On the front page of this issue of <MI>The Guardian is a call by
>the Central Committee of the Communist Party for a big campaign
>to defeat and force the repeal of the GST. The GST is a key
>element in the overall economic rationalist policies of the big
>corporations and the servile politicians who willingly do their
>bidding.
>
>The GST could be defeated. There is widespread opposition and
>disquiet about the consequences of its introduction. And here is
>yet another total lie of the Howard Government: the claim that it
>is a "fairer" tax.
>
>It will not be long before we all feel the GST picking our
>pockets, stealing our hard-come-by -- and in many instances
>meagre -- disposable income. It is already happening with
>substantial price rises taking place in supermarkets and shops.
>They are putting up prices now to recoup the millions of dollars
>of compliance costs they already have had to spend, even before
>the GST actually hits on July 1.
>
>As the Party statement says, together it is possible to throw out
>the GST. It all depends on whether YOU are prepared to do
>something about it now and in the immediate future. Later will be
>too late!
>
>********************************
>
>Culture & Life:
>In the land of the ``free''
>
>Is the US a police state? Its government and media like to parade
>the USA as a bastion of freedom, but as of this year it now has
>two million people in jail. According to the November
>Coalition, an alliance of US civil rights campaigners, justice
>policy workers and drug law reformers, the US now has a higher
>proportion of its citizens in jail than any other country in
>history.
>
>by Rob Gowland
>
>Remember the propaganda the US used to put out about the Soviet
>Union and the other socialist countries? The picture was
>relentlessly painted of a society where the population lived in
>constant fear of arrest, where masses of people were imprisoned,
>where the police were all powerful?
>
>Today, the USA comprises five percent of the global population
>yet it is responsible for 25 percent of the world's prisoners.
>Its militarised police force can shoot an unarmed man 41 times
>because he reached for his wallet -- and get off scott free.
>
>In New York city, one in three black youths is either in custody
>or on parole. Kevin Pranis, of the Prison Moratorium Project,
>says: "New York state is diverting millions of dollars from
>colleges and universities to pay for prisons we can't afford."
>
>George W Bush, governor of Texas, and favoured candidate of the
>Republican right to be the next US President, is a staunch
>supporter of both the death penalty and stiffer sentencing for
>drug offences, although neither course actually reduces the
>amount of crime or its seriousness.
>
>"Incarceration should be the last resort of a civilised society,
>not the first", says Michael Gelacak, a former vice-chairman of
>the US sentencing commission. "We have it backwards and it's time
>we realised that.''
>
>I suspect Bush would neither know nor care what Gelacak meant.
>Since Bush took over in Texas, the prison population has jumped
>from 41,000 to 150,000. Most of this huge increase is the result
>of jailing people for possession of drugs, which they consume to
>escape the ghastly reality of life in the land of the free.
>
>Calling on state and federal governments in the US to "stop
>breaking up families and destroying our communities", Nora
>Callahan of the November Coalition says succinctly: "Prison is
>not the solution to every social problem."
>
>A self evident fact, one would think, but perhaps only in a
>civilised society.
>
>Incidentally, when grandmother Karla Faye Tucker, then on death
>row, was asked by "Talk magazine "What would you say to
>Governor  Bush?" she replied with the simple request "Please
>don't kill me."
>
>"Don't kill me"
>
>Bush went on the popular Larry King talk show and publicly mocked
>her (``Please! Don't kill me.'') She was recently executed by
>lethal injection. Should he be elected President, Bush will no
>doubt harangue and bully the rest of the world about "human
>rights", a subject on which he is clearly ignorant.
>
>The initial period of public shock in the USA after the March 1
>shooting in Michigan of 6-year-old Kayla Rolland by a class-mate
>saw several media commentaries on the way US children are
>familiarised with guns and killing people by the video/computer
>games they play. And now by the prevalence of paint-ball, which
>children are encouraged to play, just like adults do.
>
>Paint-ball, which has the appearance of a training program for
>gun-nut militias, involves adults running around (usually in the
>bush but sometimes in an indoor "urban environment") dressed in
>military-style camouflage gear waging war against another team,
>using guns that fire balls full of paint that burst on
>impact.
>It has become popular in the US (and here, although less so) as a
>method of executive relaxation and bonding! It is surely a
>symptom of the decadence of decaying capitalism that
>realistically practising how to ambush and kill people can be
>considered a good way for people to "unwind" and also an
>excellent way to build "team spirit".
>
>Under these conditions, is it any wonder that a six-year-old boy
>would react to a playground argument by getting a gun from home
>and shooting the other child dead? US authorities don't seem to
>know whether to be more shocked by the fact that he did it or
>that only in the US could he "get a gun from home" -- and know
>how to use it." JC
>
>
>
>
>


__________________________________

KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki - Finland
+358-40-7177941, fax +358-9-7591081
e-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.kominf.pp.fi

___________________________________

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subscribe/unsubscribe messages
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___________________________________


Reply via email to