----- Original Message ----- 
From: Ken Boettcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Recipients of The_People List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 8:00 PM
Subject: 'Recession' Is Near


THE PEOPLE
JANUARY 2001
VOL. 110 NO. 10

LAYOFFS AND CLOSURES HINT THAT 'RECESSION' IS NEAR

Even before the U.S. Supreme Court spread the presidential 
mantle across his shoulders, George W. Bush was "acting 
presidential."

According to an article printed by THE NEW YORK TIMES on Dec. 
19, "Bush has been warning for the last two weeks that there may 
be a downturn just ahead, and that his proposal for a $1.3 
trillion tax cut over the next decade is just the prescription 
for a faltering economy."

The same report recalled that Federal Reserve chairman Alan 
Greenspan gave a speech two weeks before in which he also 
"alerted investors that he was growing increasingly nervous 
about the economy's prospects."

Apparently neither man felt the need to offer a similar word of 
warning to the working class. Perhaps they didn't think it was 
necessary, and perhaps they were right. Many workers began 
getting the message long before December.

Indeed, on the same day that THE NEW YORK TIMES article appeared 
the LOS ANGELES TIMES featured one of its own that began on the 
note that, "Job cuts and layoffs are piling up like this 
season's Midwest snow."

"In the last two weeks," the Los Angeles paper added, "job cuts 
and layoffs have become as commonplace as profit warnings, 
coming this month alone from 'old economy' firms such as General 
Motors Corp., DaimlerChrysler and Whirlpool Corp., and service 
sector giants Dun & Bradstreet Corp. and PacifiCare Health 
Systems Inc. Merger partners Chase Manhattan Corp. and J.P. 
Morgan have also announced job cuts or layoffs."

Plenty of other examples could have been added, and several 
were. On the same day--Dec. 19--in separate articles, THE NEW 
YORK TIMES reported announcements by Gillette, which said it 
would close eight factories and 13 distribution centers that 
will cost 2,700 workers their jobs; by Cummins Inc., which said 
it would soon lay off between 500 and 800 workers at its plants 
in Indiana where it assembles engines for the Dodge Ram and 
other vehicles, and a total of 1,500 in its worldwide 
operations; and by the country's biggest health insurance 
company, Aetna Inc., which announced that it would be 
eliminating 5,000 jobs from its operations, including those of 
2,400 workers who "will be dismissed over the next year."

In its Dec. 19 report, the LOS ANGELES TIMES said:

"The downsizings come on the heels of thousands of other job 
eliminations and layoffs in recent weeks, and they extend beyond 
the smokestack industries that are generally the first to take a 
hit in a downturn. Cutbacks are hitting health care, services, 
financial firms--and of course the once-vaunted tech sector."

The L.A. TIMES went on to cite some numbers gathered by 
Challenger, Gray & Christmas, which was identified as "a 
Chicago-based outplacement firm that has tracked layoff 
announcements since 1993." Those numbers showed that, "More than 
480,000 layoffs have been announced through November this year, 
53 percent of them since July....The automotive sector was 
leading all others with 59,621 announced job cuts for the year 
through November, followed by retail with 56,623."

In addition, the L.A. paper quoted Ray Hilgert, who it 
identified as a professor of management and industrial relations 
at the Olin School of Business at Washington University in St. 
Louis.

"'I think it's kind of ominous, and we're going to have a pretty 
severe jolt in 2001, with layoffs and increasing unemployment,' 
he said. 

"'I'm hoping it won't be too severe or long,' Hilgert added. 
'But...people forget that part of a marketplace economy is 
adjustments, and we're long overdue for one.'" 

According to the "experts," however, we aren't there--not yet--
even though nearly 500,000 jobs have been wiped out over the 
last six months and new layoff notices are being announced on a 
daily basis.

Socialists have steadfastly insisted that capitalism cannot 
provide anything approximating economic stability or security 
for the nation's working-class majority. Socialists have also 
been ridiculed for steadfastly insisting on what has been 
repeatedly proven and is obviously true. Whether or not workers 
will heed that message as the next capitalist crisis begins to 
unfold remains to be seen. However, if they continue to ignore 
those warnings it is a virtual certainty that they will pay a 
heavy price during the next crisis that capitalism inflicts on 
the country.



Reply via email to