Less talk and more action

<http://www.globeandmail.com/gam/Commentary/20010131/COKLEIN31.html>

by NAOMI KLEIN
Toronto Globe & Mail
Wednesday, January 31, 2001

It looks a little like one of those press conferences announcing a merger
between corporate giants: a couple of middle-aged guys shaking hands
and smiling into a bank of cameras. Just like on CNN, they assure the
world their new affiliation will make them stronger, better equipped to
meet the challenges of the global economy.

Only something is askew. More facial hair for one thing: The man on the
left has a scruffy beard and the one on the right has a rather distinctive
handlebar moustache. And come to think of it, their alliance is not a
merger of corporate interests -- designed to send stock prices soaring
and workers wondering about their "redundancy." In fact, the men say,
this merger will be good for workers and lousy for stock prices.

Another clue we're not watching CNN: Someone passes a message to
the man on the right. It seems the police are threatening him with arrest.
That definitely doesn't happen during your average corporate merger
announcement -- no matter how flagrantly the consolidation violates
antitrust laws.

The man on the left is Joao Pedro Stedile, national director of Brazil's
Landless Peasants Movement. The man on the right is Jos Bov, the
French cheese farmer who came to world attention after he "strategically
dismantled" a McDonald's restaurant, protesting a U.S. attack on
France's ban on hormone-treated beef. And this isn't Wall Street; it's the
first annual World Social Forum, in Porto Alegre, Brazil.

To read the papers, these men should not be sharing a platform, let
alone embracing for the cameras. Third World farmers are supposed to
be at war with their European counterparts over unequal subsidies. But
here in Porto Alegre, they have joined forces in a battle much broader
than any inter-governmental trade skirmish. The small farmers both men
represent are attempting to fight the consolidation of agriculture into the
hands of a few multinationals, through genetic engineering of crops,
patenting of seeds, and industrial-scale, export-led agricultural
policies.
They say that their enemy is not farmers in other countries, but a system
of trade that is facilitating this concentration, and taking the power to
regulate food production away from national governments.

"Today the battle is not in one country but in every country," Mr. Bov
tells a crowd of several thousand. They break into chants of "Ole, Ole,
Bov, Bov, Bov" and, in a matter of hours, hundreds are wearing
badges declaring, "Somos Todos Jos Bov (We are all Jos Bov)."

These types of cross-border alliances -- a globalization of movements --
are the real story of the World Social Forum, which ended yesterday and
attracted over 10,000 delegates. After 13 months of international
protests against international trade institutions, the forum has been a
chance to share ideas about social and economic alternatives. It is a
new kind of intellectual free trade: a Tobin tax swapped for a
"participatory budget"; national referendums on all trade agreements in
exchange for local lending alternatives to the International Monetary
Fund; farming co-operative models traded for community policing.

But there is one idea with more currency than any other, expressed from
podiums and on flyers handed out in hallways, "Less talk more action."
It's as if talk itself has been devalued by overproduction -- and little
wonder. In Davos, Switzerland, this week, the richest CEOs in the world
sound remarkably like their critics: We need to make globalization work
for everyone, they say, to close the income gap, end global warming.

Oddly, at the Brazil forum, designed to help talk our way into a new
future, it seems as if talking has become part of the problem. How many
times can the same story of inequality be told, the same outrage
expressed, before that expression becomes a paralyzing, rather than
catalyzing, force?

Which brings us back to the two men shaking hands. The reason the
police are after Jos Bov (and why Mr. Bov is being treated like a
cheese-making Che Guevera) is that he took a break from all the talk.
While in Brazil, Mr. Bov travelled with local landless activists to a
nearby Monsanto test site, where three hectares of genetically modified
soy were destroyed. Unlike in Europe, where similar direct-action has
occurred, the protest did not end there. The Landless Peasants
Movement has occupied the land and members are planting their own
crops, pledging to turn the farm into a model of sustainable
agriculture.

Why didn't they just talk about their problems? In Brazil, 1 per cent of the
population owns 45 per cent of the land. In the past six years alone,
85,000 families have joined the ranks of the landless.

At the first World Social Forum, the most talked-about alternative turns
out to be an alternative to talking: acting. It may just be the most powerful
alternative of all.


Reply via email to