----- Original Message -----
From: The Infamous Vinnie Gangbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, February 18, 2001 8:49 PM
Subject: [cpusa] Fwd: [gangbox] Fwd: FW: SHOCKING FACTS about U.S. income & wealth
inequality
----- Original Message -----
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The Infamous Vinnie Gangbox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 12:36:30 -0800 (PST)
Subject: [gangbox] Fwd: FW: SHOCKING FACTS about U.S. income & wealth
inequality
----- Original Message -----
From: "Farkhondeh, Simin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, jalocks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, quassan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, dorothy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, lorna
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "papertiger.org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Janine
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Marty p <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, _NikhilDesai
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Linda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alonzo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mario Alfonso Murillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Farkhondeh, Simin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kai lumumba barrow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "AZEVEDO, FERNANDO"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bender, Pennee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, yankee? <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bashir, Adesimba" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Brown, Joshua"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Degrammont, Edith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
eliza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wvtp/jerome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wvtp/minor
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wvtp/sandra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kouros
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sally <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, alex
rivera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, oscar lagos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, kara
lynch
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, karen bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
kathy leichter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, gabriella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Bertha J. Palenzuela" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, cahtarina borelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Shawn Forbes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gerda-Köln <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alexandra
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, sean sweeny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Cathy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "andrew.ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED], greg berger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 15:33:30 -0800
Subject: FW: SHOCKING FACTS
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:27:56 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SHOCKING FACTS
Shocking FACTS about U.S. income & wealth inequality
Tue, 13 Feb 2001
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After 8 years of a genuinely sociopathic "New Democrat" as President
of the United States the appalling inequality of income and wealth that
was exacerbated under the Republican President Reagan actually WORSENED.
At a time when the top 1% of U.S. citizens owns more wealth than the
bottom 95% the new U.S. President wants to further cut the taxes of
that wealthiest 1% while vast numbers of the bottom 95% live paycheck-
to-paycheck and owe enormous credit card debts.
Whether Democrat or Republican, whether Gore or Bush, the result is
the same: the U.S. is damn close to becoming a Third World nation.
Perhaps if more poor people in Honduras, the Philippines, India or
other Third World countries had credit cards they, too -- like so many
heavily-indebted Americans -- would delude themselves that they
were "well-off".
The fact is that tax rate for the wealthiest Americans was 88% in the
two decades following World War II, a time when the U.S. economy was
booming. Working-class and middle-class Americans saved more and
charged less then, too.
What follows are some disturbing facts (from www.inequality.org)
about just how far from a fair economy we've come, notwithstanding the
joint Dem-GOP deceitful propaganda that
claims most Americans are "better-off" nowadays:
* Since the mid-1970s, the most fortunate one percent of households
have doubled their share of the national wealth. They now hold more
wealth than the bottom 95 percent of the population. (Shifting
Fortunes)
* In 1998, 18.7 percent of American children lived in poverty, a lower
rate than 1993 (19.6 percent), but higher than the 1979 rate of 16.4
percent. (Columbia University, http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/nccp/)
* Nine states have reduced child poverty rates by more than 30% since
1993. These states include Tennessee, Michigan, Aransas, South
Carolina, Mississippi, Kentucky, Illinois and New Jersey. Michigan is a
prime example of a national trend, in that even the recent, dramatic
improvement did not counter the losses of the previous 15 years, in
which its poverty rate increased 121%. (Columbia University)
* In California, the number of children living in poverty has grown
from 900,000 in 1979, to 2.15 million in 1998. (Columbia University)
* Nearly 3 percent of all workers live under the federal poverty line,
defined in 1998 as $13,003 for a family of three. Counting dependents,
this encompasses roughly 5 million people.(The Conference Board,
contact Linda Barrington, 212-339-0481)
* In 1998, the top 1 percent of stock owners owned 47.7 percent of all
stock, while the bottom 80 percent owned 4.1 percent. Between 1989 and
1998, nearly 35 percent of all stock market gains went to the top 1
percent of shareholders. 64 percent of American households have stock
holdings worth $5,000 or less, or own no stock at all. (Economic Policy
Institute)
* Between 1995 and 1998, the total wealth of the typical American
household rose from $58,800 to $61,000. The average value of stock
holdings rose $5,500, the value of non-stock assets (mostly homes)
climbed $8,500, and household debt increased $11,800. (Economic Policy
Institute)
* Middle-class families enjoyed 2.8 percent of the stock market gains
between 1989 and 1998, but accounted for 38.8 percent of the increase
in household debt. (Economic Policy Institute)
* In 1998, 62.9 percent of private sector workers had employer-provided
healthcare, down from 63.1 percent in 1989. 49.2 percent of private
sector workers have employer-provided pension plans. (Economic Policy
Institute)
* 60 percent of U.S. workers say that if they were laid off, their
savings are sufficient to maintain their current standard of living for
a few months or less. Only 29 percent said they are able to save for
the future. 40 percent say they earn enough to be comfortable, but not
to save, while 27 percent said they earn only enough to get by, and 3
percent said they are unable to pay their bills. (Fleet Bank, contact
Rena DeSisto, 212-703-1961)
* 64 percent of U.S. workers say they would rather have more time than
more money. Even in households earning less than $25,000, 49 percent
said they would still prefer time over money. (Fleet Bank)
* Fewer than 43,000 estates -- 2 percent of the total -- paid federal
estate taxes in 1997. (Money, 9/2000)
* In 2000, the federal estate tax is expected to raise $27 billion,
more than double the amount of federal income taxes paid by the bottom
half of all taxpayers. (United For a Fair Economy,
http://www.ufenet.org/activist/action_alert/Estate_Tax_Talking_Points.ht
ml)
* A study by Treasury Department economist David Joulfaian found that
eliminating the estate tax would reduce charitable bequests by about 12
percent. (United For a Fair Economy)
* While the top tax rate is 55 percent, on average, estate taxes
represent 17 percent of the gross value of the estate. (United For a
Fair Economy)
* More than 2.5 million households have investable assets of more than
$1 million, up from 2 million households in 1995. (Time, 12/14/98)
* As a result of stock-market gains, the most affluent 25-30 percent of
American households) are about 20 times wealthier, on average, than
they were in 1989. (New York Times, 9/20/98)
* Among the industrialized nations, the U.S. has the highest
concentration of individual wealth--roughly 3 times that of the No. 2
nation, Germany. (UN Human Development Report, 1998)
* As of 1997, the richest five percent of U.S. households held more
than 60 percent of the nation's private wealth. The top 1 percent of
households held 40 percent of the wealth. (Edward Wolff, relying on
data from the Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances)
* Between 1983 and 1995, the average net worth of households in the
bottom 40 percent of the population declined by 80 percent, from $4,400
to $900. The net worth of the middle fifth of the population declined
by 11 percent. (Shifting Fortunes, Edward Wolff)
* Most Americans in the highest-earning one percent of the population
(median annual income: $330,000) don't consider themselves rich. (Worth-
Roper Starch Survey)
* The inflation-adjusted net worth of the median household fell from
$54,600 in 1989 to $49,900 in 1997. In nearly one out of five
households, debts exceed assets. Household debt as a percentage of
personal income rose from 58 percent in 1973 to an estimated 85 percent
in 1997. (Chuck Collins, Betsy Leondar-Wright, Holly Sklar, Shifting
Fortunes)
* As of 1995, 40 percent of American households owned stock either
directly or through a mutual fund or some sort of retirement plan.
Almost 90 percent of the value of all stocks and mutual funds was held
by 10 percent of the households. (Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer
Finances)
* Between 1983 and 1995, only the highest-earning five percent of
households saw an increase in their financial net worth. By 1995, the
bottom 40 percent of families headed by those between the ages of 25-54
had no savings. The middle quintile of income-earners (the middle
class) have enough savings to sustain their standard of living for 1.2
months, down from 3.6 months in 1989. (Federal Reserve data as analyzed
by Edward Wolff)
* Between 1983 and '89, the net worth of American citizens grew by $5
trillion. About 54 percent of that new wealth went to the half-million
families who make up the top one-half of one percent of the population.
Federal Reserve and IRS data confirm that the net worth of the top 1
percent of Americans now dwarfs that of the bottom 90 percent--the most
extreme wealth concentration since the 1920s. (Jeff Gates, "An
Ownership Solution")
* The likelihood of facing an Internal Revenue Service audit if you
earned more than $100,000 last year: 1.03 percent. In 1988, the audit
rate was 11.4 percent for such taxpayers. Now their chance of being
audited is smaller than that of taxpayers earning less than $25,000 a
year; their rate is 1.5 percent. (The New York Times, April 16, 2000)
* The Gini coefficient is a complex statistical measure of inequality;
a 0 coefficient is perfect equality (everyone has the same share),
while a 1 coefficient is total inequality (one person has everything).
In 1997, the United States had a Gini coefficient of 0.375, up from
0.323 in 1973. The 1997 figure is higher than any other "wealthy"
country. Britain's is 0.346, Germany's 0.300, Canada's 0.286 and
Sweden's 0.222. However, these figures relate to income, and Alan
Greenspan points out that when applied to consumption, the Gini number
for the U.S. falls by about 25 percent. In other words, the poor are
more likely to own the same televisions, washing machines, etc., as the
rich, than income figures might suggest. (Fortune, 9/4/00)
* 5.4 million Americans live in substandard housing or spend more than
half their income on rent. (Fortune, 9/4/00)
* Income inequality declined from the late 1930s through the '60s. In
the 1920s, the richest five percent of American families received about
30 percent of the nation's personal income. That share had decreased to
17.5 percent of income by 1947, and to 15.6 percent by 1969, according
to the Census Bureau (whose figures underestimate high incomes by,
among other things, excluding capital gains). After a brief period of
stability, inequality began widening in the late '70s. The income share
going to the richest five percent of families reached 17.9 percent in
1989, 20.3 percent in 1996. The richest one-half of 1 percent of
American taxpayers now account for more than 11 percent of aggregate
income. In recent years, only college graduates, about a quarter of the
work force, have racked up significant wage gains. (Frank Levy, "The
New Dollars and Dreams: American Incomes and Economic Change")
* From 1989 to 1999, real compensation for the average CEO rose 62.7
percent. The ratio of CEO pay to average worker pay stands at 107:1. In
1989, it was 56:1.(Economic Policy Institute)
* Since 1979, the average income of the highest-earning one percent of
Americans has increased by roughly 80 percent, while the income of the
highest-earning 20 percent has increased by 18 percent. The bottom 60
percent of the population has experienced a decrease in real income.
(Shifting Fortunes)
* In 1973, the combined income of the highest-earning 20 percent of
American families was 7.5 times that of the bottom 20 percent. By 1996,
the multiple was 13. (Census Bureau)
* In 1998, the average American worker's inflation-adjusted weekly
wages were 12 percent below what they had been in 1973. (Collins,
Leondar-Wright and Sklar, Shifting Fortunes)
* In 1947, children were slightly less likely than adults to be poor.
Now the reverse is true. (Frank Levy) The official poverty rate among
children is about twenty percent. Among adults, it's twelve percent.
(New York Times, 1/4/99)
* Although the wage gap has moderated slightly in the last few years,
over-all income differences continue to widen, due to the impact of
stock market gains. Americans with taxable incomes above $200,000 may
only constitute a tenth of a percent of the population, but they
accounted for 18.1 of the household income reported in 1996, up from
14.6 percent in 1994. In 1997, that share increased again, to 19.9
percent. (New York Times, 2/28/99)
* Among chief executives of the biggest U.S. corporations, the median
increase in overall compensation was about 10 percent last year, up
from 25 percent in 1997, according to Graef Crystal. Corporate profits,
meanwhile, rose 5 percent, and factory employees' pay, 2.6 percent.
(New York Times, 4/4/99)
* With stock options factored in, the average CEO of a major U.S.
corporation made $7.8 million in 1997, up from $5.8 million in 1996.
(Business Week, 4/20/98)
* The average CEO makes 728 times more than a minimum wage worker. If
the minimum wage had risen at the same rate as executive pay over the
last three daces, it would stand at nearly $41 an hour as opposed to
$5.15. (Institute for Policy Studies/United for a Fair Economy, April
23, 1998)
* As a result of the merger between Chrysler and Daimler Benz, Chrysler
chairman Robert Eaton will get $69.9 million in cash and stocks, and
options worth another $239 million. In 1997, Daimler chairman Juergen
Schrempp took home $2.5 million, while Eaton made $16 million, though
Schrempp ran a larger and more profitable company. (United for a Fair
Economy)
* Since 1986, Bill Gates has been earning money at the rate of roughly
$650,000 an hour. If there were such a thing as a $500 bill, it would
not be worth Mr. Gates' while to take the time (circa 4 four seconds)
to bend down and pick one up off the ground. (Bill Gates Net Worth
Page).
* The average wage of a Silicon Valley software engineer was $95,800 in
1998, the most recent year for which the data is available. In the
largest of all employment categories, "local and visitor services"
(including retail and restaurant workers), the average wage was
$22,9000. (The New York Times, Jan. 10, 2000).
Health Patterns
Infant Mortality
* Eight American infants die for every 1,000 who are born. The infant
mortality rate for African-Americans is twice as high: 15.8 deaths per
1,000 live births. (Childrens Defense Fund)
* The only OECD nations with higher rates of infant mortality are
Hungary, Korea, Mexico, Poland, and Turkey. In 1994, 31,710 U.S. babies
died. Fifteen thousand of them would have survived if our infant
mortality rate was equal to Japan's. (Childrens Defense Fund) Life
Expectancy
* The United States spends more on medical care--13.6 percent of gross
domestic product--than any other advanced industrialized society. Yet
among the 29 OECD nations, we rank 21st in life expectancy. (Childrens
Defense Fund) The average life expectancy for white Americans is 76.8
years. For black Americans, it stands at 70.2 years (Department of
Human Services Health United States Report, 1998)
* Death rates in the most economically divided metropolitan areas--such
as Pine Bluff, Ark., an Mobile, Ala.--are sharply higher than the
national annual average of 850 deaths per 100,000 people. The increase
in mortality--an extra 140 deaths per 100,000 people--is equivalent to
the combined loss of life from lung cancer, diabetes, motor vehicle
accidents, HIV, infection, suicide and homicide during 1995. (Lynch
J.W., Kaplan G.A., Pamuk E.R., et al. "Income inequality and mortality
in metropolitan areas of the United States," American Journal of Public
Health 1998)
The Uninsured
* Roughly forty-three million Americans--one sixth of the population--
have no health insurance. In 1990, the figure was 32 million. (Knight-
Ridder 2/19/99)
* Eighteen percent of workers between 18 and 64 were uninsured in 1997--
an increase of 15.7 percent over 1990. Sixty-nine percent of white
workers were covered by employer-sponsored insurance, compared with 52
percent of African American workers and 44 percent of Latino workers.
(Sacramento Bee)
* One in four American workers has no access to employment-based health
insurance coverage at any price. (General Accounting Office, Feb 1997,
Employment-Based Health Insurance Costs)
* About ten million children are uninsured. In 1996, 70 percent of all
Americans added to the ranks of the uninsured were children. (Census
Bureau)
__________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at
http://webmail.netscape.com/
portside (the left side in nautical parlance) is a
news, discussion and debate service of the Committees
of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism. It
aims to provide varied material of interest to people
on the left.
Post : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subscribe : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Unsubscribe : mail to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
List owner : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web address : <http://www.egroups.com/group/portside>
Digest mode : visit Web site
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
GANGBOX: CONSTRUCTION WORKERS NEWS SERVICE
GANGBOX homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/gangbox/
comments? email: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"UNION NOW, UNION FOREVER"
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---------------------~-~>
eGroups is now Yahoo! Groups
Click here for more details
http://click.egroups.com/1/11231/0/_/229322/_/982529350/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
