From: Rick Rozoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Visit our website: HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK
---------------------------------------------

http://www.mediamonitors.net/gowans25.html

Media Monitors Network
September 6, 2001

US Ambassador admits Washington is subverting the
Belarus presidential election
         

by Stephen Gowans
The United States has launched a massive campaign to
subvert the September 9th Belarusian presidential
election in a effort to topple President Alexander
Lukashenka, who has been moving slower on "free market
reforms" than Washington would like. And Washington is
using a strategy similar to one it used to oust the
Nicaraguan Sandinista government in the 80's, and to
depose Slobodan Milosevic in Yugoslavia last year.

The campaign, which involves funneling money to
non-governmental agencies (NGO's) opposed to
Lukashenka, a youth group reminiscent of the US-backed
Serb resistance group that was instrumental in
toppling Slobodan Milosevic, and Radio Free Europe
broadcasts urging Belarusians to vote for Lukashenka's
US-backed opponent, was revealed by the US Ambassador
to Belarus,  Michael Kozak.

Nicknamed "the weasel" by former CIA director William
Casey, Kozak served as Principal Deputy Assistant
Secretary for Inter-American Affairs, working in
Panama and El Salvador in the 80's, and in Nicaragua
at a time Washington was employing various shady and
illegal means to topple the Sandanistas, including
illegally funneling money to the Contras.  In a
startling letter to a British newspaper, Kozak
revealed last week that  Washington's "objective and
to some degree  methodology are the same" in Belarus
as in Nicaragua, sparking fears that Washington is
prepared to up the ante if Lukanshenka wins the
September 9th election.

In mid-August, according to Belarusian TV, Kozak told
ex-Grodno Region Governor Semyon Domash to withdraw
his candidacy for presidency and throw his support
behind Vladimir Goncharyk , a trade union leader and
former Communist. Goncharyk agreed to make Domash his
prime minister should he  win.

Last year, US Secretary of State Madleine Albright had
similarly directed the fractured Yugoslav opposition
to coalesce around a single candidate to contest a
presidential election in which Slobodan Milosevic,
incongruously branded a dictator, stood as Socialist
Party candidate. Washington funneled millions into the
coalition's war chest, and insisted that Vojislav
Kostunica, admired as a Serb patriot, lead the
coalition. 

But Washington's hopes that Lukanshenka will lose the
election could be dashed. An August 23rd AFP report
says that Goncharyk "recorded only a 10 percent
approval rating in a recent opinion poll."

Lukashenka, long demonized in the Western press, has
come in for some particularly harsh treatment in the
runup to the September 9th election. The Wall Street
Journal calls Lukashenka's Belarus a "semi-fascist"
state . The Washington Times calls the country  an
"authoritarian police state" and an "unabashed
dictatorship." Lukashenka is variously described as a
strongman, hard-liner, tyrant, and Europe's last
dictator, in a reprise of the campaign that painted
Milosevic in similarly menacing hues. And, to top off
the allegations, Ambassador Kozak calls Belarus "worse
than Cuba." 

But the British Helsinki Human Rights Group (BHHRG),
which sent observers to the country, says the charge
that Belarus is worse than Cuba is puzzling.  Belarus
has multi-party elections, allows the opposition
access to the media, and welcomes foreign human rights
monitors into the country. Cuba allows none of these
things. And Cuba hasn't allowed an American General
into the country since 1959, yet Belarus allowed  NATO
Supreme Allied Commander General Jospeh Ralston to
visit the country on July 23 to address a press
conference critical of Lukashenka. And while Cuba
regularly jams US-sponsored anti-Castro Radio Marti
broadcasts, anti-Lukashenka Radio Free Europe
broadcasts go unchallenged.

Moreover, says the human rights group, "even President
Lukashenka's most vehement opponents refused to
characterize him as a tyrant or dictator, and none of
the President's critics alleged even a significant
degree of repression in society in general."

US-sponsored anti-Lukashenka Radio Free Europe
broadcasts have doubled during the election period,
backing up an already substantial collection of
US-funded NGO's arrayed against the Belarusian
president. A spokesperson at the US Embassy in Minsk
told The (London) Times that the embassy helped to
fund 300 NGOs, including media, many of which are
opposed to Lukashenka. And a youth group, Zubr,
bearing a uncanny resemblance to Otpor, the
anti-Milosevic student group trained and funded by
Washington, has been putting up stickers that portray
Lukashenka as a criminal.

Despite its massive efforts to sway the vote against
Lukashenka, Washington is hedging its bets. The State
Department has already  warned that the election will
be flawed. Critics point out that this is a
"heads-I-win-tails-you-lose" strategy,  where
Washington insists the fairness of  the election be
judged on the basis of whether its candidate wins.
Washington used the same approach in last year's
presidential elections in Yugoslavia, warning, when it
was clear Milosevic would do well at the polls, that
the election would be fraudulent.

Ironically, Washington pre-condemns as unfair
elections its favored candidates stand a good chance
of losing, but is blissfully unconcerned about whether
its massive funding of opposition groups and the
antigovernment press severely limits the freedom and
fairness of the elections it intervenes in. Americans
are prepared to tolerate no foreign intervention in
their own electoral affairs, or even to allow monitors
to oversee their own elections.

Key to Washington's campaign against Lukashenka in the
West is portraying the Belarusian president as a
repressive tyrant, an ominous sign that the White
House  may be softening Western public opinion for
more drastic measures should Lukashenka win the
election. But the  BHHRG says that "opposition
criticism of Lukashenka's Belarus lays the emphasis on
matters such as foreign investment and the need to
move closer to the Western mainstream," not human
rights abuses or political repression. Political
repression is a Washington invention.

Writing in the American Spectator, Daniel McAdams says
that Washington's real beef with Lukashenka is that he
hasn't moved fast enough on economic reforms, not his
human rights abuses,  which are grossly exaggerated,
even fabricated, and, even if they were real, are
hardly different from those of former Russian
President Boris Yeltsin, who Washington supported.
McAdams points out that  the usual complaint about
Lukashenka is that he abolished the parliament, cheats
on elections, and is autocratic. But Boris Yeltsin
ruled almost exclusively by decree, cheated on every
election, and blew up a parliament he didn't like.
Argues McAdams, the difference between Yeltsin, the
admired reformer, and  Lukashenko, smeared as an
autocrat, is that Yeltsin was enthusiastic about
embracing the free market, while Lukashenka's passions
for free market reforms have proved less than
overwhelming. 

Belarus produces a number of consumer and industrial
goods, including refrigerators, tractors, televisions,
trucks, buses, petrochemicals, fertilizers, tires, not
privately, but all under state control. Washington,
and the US-backed opposition would rather state owned
enterprises be privately owned, and Belarus throw open
its doors to outside, and mainly US, investment.

But Lukashenka, and  many Belarusians, fear that
economic reforms will produce the disasters that have
befallen former Communist countries that have embraced
 the free market, like Poland and Russia. Russia, once
offering a comfortable and secure material existence
to all its citizens, has seen the number of its
citizens living on less than $4 a day grow from 4
million to 147 million since adopting free market
reforms. 

Pro-reformers say Russian's economic woes are  simply
"normal bumps on the road to a market economy," but
Belarusians have good reasons not to want to go over
the same terrain. 

Soviet Russia cranked out more engineers and
scientists than any country in the  world. Today, 10
million Russian children don't go to school. In 10
years the economy has shrunk by half. Real incomes
have plunged 40 percent. A third of the country lives
in extreme poverty, many on the verge of starvation.
Eighty per cent of the people have no savings. Life
expectancy for men has fallen to 19th century levels.
The suicide rate has doubled; alcoholism has tripled.
Old diseases, once thought eliminated ? cholera,
typhus, diphtheria ? have come roaring back. The last
ten years has seen, as Stephen Cohen of New York
University puts it, the "endless collapse of
everything essential to a decent existence."

Lukashenka is said to believe that the economy should
serve the people, not the other way around, an
out-of-fashion idea, and not one Washington is
prepared, or has ever been prepared, to tolerate.

US governments have a long history of subverting
elections when it looked like electorates  might make
irresponsible choices, as Henry Kissinger once said of
Chile's fondness for electing Slavador Allende, a man
whose commitment to the free-market was as lukewarm as
Lukashenka's. In those days, you could point to
Allende's alleged cozying up to Communism to justify
the subversion of democracy. Today, with the Communist
menace inconveniently departed, another, equally
contrived menace, is pressed into service -- abuses of
civil and political rights.

Apart from the infamous intervention of Washington
into the electoral affairs of Chile, the US has
intervened in numerous elections to assure that its
operating principle prevails: we'll accept the outcome
of democracy, just as long as it's agreeable to
America's vital interests, vital interests being a
vague, but high-sounding phrase, that reduces to: our
right to economically dominate any  part of the world
we choice, which these days, on top of the Balkans,
includes Belarus. 

And so, as the days count down to the September 9th
election, Lukashenka gets, what researcher and writer
Rick Rozoff calls, "the Milosevic treatment." If
Washington can't turn Belarus's electorate against
Lukashenka, it's prepared to turn Western public
opinion against him, and when it's prepared to do
that, Washington is preparing to show its darker side.


Lukashenka is a marked man. And all because he thinks
the economy should serve the people.

Mr. Steve Gowans is a writer and political activist
who lives in Ottawa, Canada.




_________________________________________________
 
KOMINFORM
P.O. Box 66
00841 Helsinki
Phone +358-40-7177941
Fax +358-9-7591081
http://www.kominf.pp.fi
 
General class struggle news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe mails to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Geopolitical news:
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
__________________________________________________

Reply via email to