On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 01:47:48PM -0500, Micha?l Larouche wrote: > Currently we use these names for KConfigXT generated classes > > Kopete::AppearanceSettings > Kopete::BehaviorSettings > Kopete::Config > > and I'm wondering if these would be better > > Kopete::Appearance > Kopete::Behavior > Kopete::Config > > Config will be for general settings.
what about the following? Kopete::Settings::Appearance Kopete::Settings::Behavior Kopete::Settings It indicates they are for settings, and still gives them sane names. Also, do we really need three settings classes? I know that's the way they're broken up in the configuration dialog, but this is for configuration we want to make available to plugins and protocols and IMHO, it doesn't make sense to do the split here. Thanks -- Matt _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
