Matt Rogers wrote: >Do we have any hard numbers of how fast normalized vs. unnormalized is? > Right now, it's nothing more than a coding style issue since the > improvments can't be quantified.
normalised connects are just a strcmp away. Unnormalised make it two strcmp plus the normalisation itself, which includes the creation of a QByteArray (so, memory allocation). It'll depend on the complexity of the parameter signature, of course. The point is that the connection always happens on normalised signatures so, if you don't give Qt one, it'll normalise for you. Conclusion: normalised connects are faster than non-normalised connects in all cases. Gof did some testing: http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-optimize&m=113179145816900&w=2 He found a 100% decrease in connection speed by using non-normalised signatures. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint: E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C 966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358
pgpVQkacPoXdT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
