On Monday 11 January 2010 12:12:05 Frank Schaefer wrote: > Tomáš Trnka schrieb: > > Dne So 9. ledna 2010 19:58:23 Frank Schaefer napsal(a): > >> /*! > >> \fn VideoDevicePool::open() > >> */ > >> > >> What kind of code documentation ist that and how does it work ? It's not > >> doxygen, right ? > > > > Hello Frank, > > > > actually, that is Qt code documentation style, one of the two Doxygen > > (the other one is Javadoc) styles. See here for additional info: > > http://www.stack.nl/~dimitri/doxygen/docblocks.html > > > > 2T > > Hmm, thanks Tomáš, I've never seen this Qt-style before... > Are there any good reasons for using it instead of the Javadoc-style ? > (If not, why did they try to reinvent the wheel ? ;) ) > I see both styles beeing used, so I guess there is no clear policy ? > > Cheers, > Frank >
No policy really. javadoc style is prefered over Qt style, in general, using slash command names (like \param and \return), instead of at command names (like @param and @return) but you should go with whatever the majority of the file already is. -- Matt _______________________________________________ kopete-devel mailing list kopete-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kopete-devel
