On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:36 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2016-11-10 20:01 GMT+03:00 Pali Rohár <pali.ro...@gmail.com>: >> On Monday 07 November 2016 10:35:23 4ernov wrote: >>> 2016-11-07 12:15 GMT+03:00 R.Harish Navnit <harishnav...@gmail.com>: >>> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:35 PM, 4ernov <4er...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >> Thanks, Harish. Actually we've discussed with Pali, which >>> >> protocols would be useful to be ported and those which are more >>> >> or less "alive" were ported. I think, the remaining could be >>> >> turned off for now, as >>> > >>> > So the remaining are the ones written down in the INSTALL file, >>> > right ? I think it's important to document this somewhere. We >>> > can't expect a new comer to know these details. >>> > >>> > So I just wanted to confirm that we haven't missed(or added any >>> > extras) any such protocols in the INSTALL file. >>> >>> OK. At current state the following protocols remain unported (fail to >>> compile): >>> - yahoo >>> - sms >>> - skype >>> - qq >> >> IIRC current version of qq is not working anymore. >> >>> Following our previous discussion, they could be either turned off by >>> default or removed from the tree and CMake files completely, if >>> there's low chance they'd be used by anyone. There's also IRC >>> protocol, which I've ported as well, >> >> IRC is broken and does not work on KDE4 version of Kopete. I would >> delete it from git after switching to KF5. >> >>> but it fails to link for me for >>> unknown reason. Probably, there's something in terms of missing moc >>> files. Given that I saw some efforts on updating it here, probably my >>> work is a little out of date, so I didn't merge it to "kf5". >> >> Ok. So current code is in kf5 branch of main kopete repository. I >> believe other branches now contains old code and other personal cloned >> repositories too... > > Yes, I just can confirm, that all my clones and other "kf5-*" branches > on official Kopete repository are out of date and "kf5" branch > contains my most recent commits. So probably it's most up-to-date and > complete in terms of KF5 porting. So that's wonderful news. Maybe someone will need to review and test the changes in the KF5 branch and get them merged to master.
There's an interesting discussion going on in the kde-devel ML's too btw, ICYMI : https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=147882011502219&w=2 Cheers, Harish
