begin  quoting Todd Walton as of Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:16:28PM -0800:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 20:14:25 -0800, Stewart Stremler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
> wrote:
> > With regards to the fingerprinting... it seems like a trivial thing
> > to fuzz the clock skew randomly, and so render the whole scheme useless.
> 
> Yes, yes.  But random by what measure?  What if the "random" skew is
> actually correlatable by those who know what RNG you're using?

Thus, the need for a _real_ source of randomness.
 
Of course, there's no knowing what PRNG you're using today, nor what the
seed is.

> [threads so far off topic they come back and meet themselves.  my goodness.]

Ain't drift wonderful?

-Stewart "Sandbar" Stremler
-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to