-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Stewart Stremler wrote:
> True. Very unwise. They ought to be trained better.
> 
> Isn't there a POP-over-SSL?
> 
> -Stewart "Wouldn't it be better to use imaps anyway?" Stremler

Yes and yes. But it is more complicated to set up and MUA's are more
buggy when using it. I use it. But I am yet to convince everyone in my
office to use it.


- --
Tracy R Reed
http://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCZb5C9PIYKZYVAq0RAgKBAKCTR5M4pBvu+YJE15RHIuB04R5WzwCePnP6
Nk9YM1dIu54fEAmFuk/b+c4=
=HuM+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to