From: m ike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >From: m ike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > people. THats all the compensation I want or need.
> >
> >fine. but what you are really saying that that is all the
> >compensation that anyone has the right to want or need.
> >
> Yes, I am. You own the copy of the painting you made. You sold it.
like I said, learn to read. (duhh, where did I say Joe sold the
painting to anyone?)
You said its at the museum. Did you mean it mmagicly teleported there
itself? I assume not. That means he sold it to the museum. Unless he lent
it to them. In that case, its still the same logic- he gave it to a public
showing. Its now no longer his personal painting, but a part of our
culture. The paint and canvas may belong to him, but not the idea.
> Its no
> longer yours. Feel free to make another one, but you have no right to
try
> and stop me from doing the same. Art does not and should not belong to
one
> person- not even its creator. Art is part of our cultural heritage,
part of
> what it is to be human. It belongs to all the people.
You are making me laugh here, and with the rest of
your opinion. How do you ever expect to contribute
to open source with reasoning like that?
Umm, I expect to contibute the normal way- open a text editor or IDE and
start coding. Unless you, in your holy wisdom, know another way? The real
question is- how do you ever expect to make any sort of positive
contribution to society with yours?
Gabe
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
