begin  quoting gossamer axe as of Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 11:25:17AM -0700:
Stremler wrote:
> >Old FIDONET systems often had a feature where you'd reply to everything,
> >and then upload all of the responses at once.  I knew some folks who
> >used this to help eliminate their "stupid posts".
> 
> It was referred to as an "Offline mail reader" (you downloaded QWK packets)

Yup. There were a number of 'em. Some were quite nice.

I have my archives somewhere. I need to dig 'em out and put 'em on
the Net before they get lost.

> and it was used because unlike the internet, time was limited on most BBSs.

s/internet/broadband/

My parents are still time-limited, on account of having 20 hours/month
for dialup, which is sufficient for 'em download their email, hang up,
respond, call back, upload their responses, and hang up again. They
don't use their 20 hours/month, most months.

> Fidonet had hundreds of message areas and it's impossible to read them, and
> respond all in 30 minutes, much less get to the local areas. 

I know folks who _started_ a BBS just to get around that. :)

>                                                               My BBS had
> mulitple message nets and I pulled in thousands of messages everytime a
> message package was delivered.  It also made it easier to make a PCR (post
> call ratio) in order to play online games.  In 24 hours I don't know if I
> could have read each and every message that came through on my BBS...and my
> BBS was small compared to others in the area.

Heh.
 
> Besides why waste the 30 minutes reading messages when you could play LORD!

Common high-scores tables to tend to generate a sense of community,
don't they?

-- 
_ |\_  "nethack.alt.org is my bane at the moment. Too bad I suck."
 \|


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to