Lan Barnes wrote: > On Fri, December 1, 2006 10:17 am, Andrew Lentvorski wrote: >> Lan Barnes wrote: >>> IANAL but I think Todd has a valid point. My understanding is that if >>> you >>> have a patent and don't defend it vigorously against what you consider >>> infringement, then after a while you have said to the world that it is >>> not >>> infringement (or defensible). >> Trademarks require vigorous defense. >> >> I do not believe this to be the case for patents. >> >> -a >> > > Told ya I wasn't a lawyer
Well, we thought you were, and naturally assumed you were lying. ..j -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
