Unfortunately "if everyone only" arguments rarely lead to practical solutions.
I can see a lot of ways to do it within an essentially closed but extensible network e.g. friends. Doing it in a universally accessible way though is a bit more of a puzzle. OK, how about this (not perfect but it may be good enough) Offer a web mail service via HTTP over SSL. All access to the service mus tbe throuh a netwrok of these mail portals. The inter-server communications streams is all encrypted. Just thinking aloud. I need to go learn a little more about http over ssl. BobLQ On 1/25/07, Tracy R Reed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bob La Quey wrote: > Stegonagraphy has always seemed really neat to me. Here are some I've never been that interested in it since it is hard to encode anything but trivial messages in it. > Is anyone offering a secure messaging service? > > If they are they had better be offshore ;) I communicate with friends using GPG regularly. No need to be offshore. And if everyone encrypted their communications with GPG a single encrypted communication would not stand out and steganography would not be as needed. - -- Tracy R Reed http://ultraviolet.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFuHNk9PIYKZYVAq0RAshXAJ48v8z82WuyydoWRIESmb1jFfpF9QCfcOfu 28SlzMZly/n1Gj/165VH2pg= =5yuz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
-- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
