-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Lentvorski wrote: > decided that there was no reason to develop for anything else. And they > are economically quite correct.
Only in the short term. History will show us just what "short term" means. - -- Tracy "signing this message with the best public standard PKI there is" Reed http://ultraviolet.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFwCrV9PIYKZYVAq0RAjYaAJ9J8UliJ2fCEhbJ90EFQSSzh9aStwCfTA2y LJKFXRy3jFbkCL2yvV/n1Tc= =7G6W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
