On Fri, April 20, 2007 12:06 am, Stewart Stremler wrote: > begin quoting Lan Barnes as of Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 10:06:58AM -0700: > [snip] >> Maybe the server could also strip the headers and signatures so that if >> the list was penetrated, you couldn't track the content back. Hmm ... > > We'd also need to mangle the text to obfuscate the grammatical habits; > some folks have a characteristic style of writing that would let someone > with an archive of several conversations figure out who wrote what. >
Why? Does GPG let that kind of bias through in the encrypted output? "I can't tell what is says, but the cypher is _so_ Lan Barnes." > I'm thinking of morse-code "fists", but applied to prose. > > Plus, not knowing who is writing what might result in some rather odd > conversations. > Oh, we have those anyway. >> you'd really have to put that server in a hardened bunker in a country >> that lets you do just about anything. With maybe a thermite charge on >> top >> of the HD that triggers if anyone opens the door without a combination. > > Oh, I'm sure the thermite charge thing can be done just about anywhere. > Just beware power outages. > >> OK, I'm the idea guy. The rest of you are the development team. > > We need funding. > </me digs in pocket> Yes, that we will. > -- > _Conspiracy Theory_ was a rather fun film. > Stewart Stremler > Jerry: "Oh, you haven't seen her run ..." -- Lan Barnes SCM Analyst Linux Guy Tcl/Tk Enthusiast Biodiesel Brewer -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
