John H. Robinson, IV wrote:
rbw wrote:
I have a CentOS server at home in the same condition as the one at work
and "cifs" mount does work there. I think I am a little thrown by the
idea that I can ftp and ssh to the box by IP and by hostname, and
therefore routing is good, but I get a "no route to host" when I try to
"cifs" mount that same CentOS box at work.
It is possible that a router or firewall is denying those ports on the
effected systems explictly. You may need to talk with the network guys.
-john
So I guess I would be asking for a rule that would allow anyone to reach
that server here:
cifs 3020/tcp # CIFS
cifs 3020/udp # CIFS
In the alternative, if I get no cooperation, I could I think, slap a
router between the network and the switch and create a subnet with the
proper routing and stick the server inside that subnet... It would be
nice if they opened up access to the server though...
rbw
--
KPLUG-List@kernel-panic.org
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
