Dexter Filmore wrote:
Yes, but TFTs didn't start at only 8" meant as a computer display.

Um, are you a young'un? ;)

Your statement is factually incorrect. See: Mac Powerbook 170 9.8" 640x400 and and Powerbook 180c 8.4" 640x480. Egregiously expensive, power hungry, and notorious for pixel failures.

This was at the start of TFT's. At the time, nobody dreamed that they would eventually replace CRT's.

Has to do with how OLEDs are produced. Producing a *small* OLED panel is easy, and those go at below 60 bucks in RGB. But as soon as you increase panel size, you have to make bigger light emitting cells.

You can also make more of the same size. Just like TFT's. A single pixel error on a TFT TV doesn't drop an area a quarter inch square. It only wipes a single element of the cluster.

You don't have that problem with TFT since you only have to make a larger backlight area and cover that with larger LC fields. Not too hard.

Yeah, tell that to the poor engineers who had to slog through this "not too hard" problem and the companies who have to invest in completely new fabs at each new generation. There is a reason that TFT prices are exponential with number of pixels.

Cell display != desktop computer display. I had LCDs in pocket calcs 20 years ago, that would be saying like TFTs weren't vaporware 20 years ago because the calc LCDs existed.

20 years ago was only 1987. TFTs weren't vaporware. They were just egregiously expensive. 4 years later they were in a portable computer and merely expensive.

In addition, not all of the expense in TFTs was TFT technology. TFTs needed digital semiconductors working at quite a lot faster speeds that a CRT system. Graphics chips were a hard problem in 1991. OLED does not have this problem since TFT has already paved that path.

Uh.. your fav bunch of IT newsticker, tech newspapers..?

Uh ... do you really think I would have asked if the rags I read said anything concrete? All of my engineering rags indicate that the emission stuff is still stuck in the lab.

-a


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to