Lan Barnes wrote: > But on another tack (hijack alert), svn is powers of 10 improved over cvs, > but still enough flawed so that I for one don't want to go there.
Give Subversion some credit. Is it 10x better than CVS or not? If a product achieved that then they deserve *some* luv. If that is *still* not good enough for your standards then I fret you'll *never* find a SCM system fine enough for you. I've used CVS and Subversion and so I *love* Subversion. I wanted to like Git and Mercurial but couldn't see a pressing reason to go decentralized. Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
