Chris Louden wrote:
> I find it interesting that so many of you use the DNS provided by your
> ISP. I bet many are not even patched for the latest vulnerabilies.
> 
>  I would think at the very least tech savvy people would be using high
> level DNS servers like 4.2.2.2 & 4.2.2.1.
> 
> Best case senario would be using something like OpenDNS 208.67.222.222
> and 208.67.220.220.

I have used opendns (temporarily) to check/fix my RR problems several
times, but I haven't changed my gateway -- I guess there's a little of
"if they're supposed to give me dns, I'm not going to let them out of
it" mentality[*] in me.

What's the story behind sys.gtei.net (4.2.2.[1-6])?
Do they do this as a public service, or is there a business purpose?
At least their address is easier to memorize than opendns. :-)

OpenDNS has a webpage describing some pay services, and I see they also
return, for bogus names, an answer with authority=0 which, I suppose is
a little like an ad. I've wondered if that has any downside. I suppose
resolvers should always check authority, eh?

[* same reason I drink tap water, I guess]

Regards,
..jim


-- 
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to