begin quoting Andrew Lentvorski as of Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 04:39:08PM -0700:
> James G. Sack (jim) wrote:
> >You can guess the synopsis (not quite ready for prime time) -- but he
> >does a good job of summarizing things, and I happen to agree with his
> >priorities.
> >
> >http://jcornuz.wordpress.com/2008/08/21/using-linux-for-photography-where-we-stand/
>
> It's particularly good because it talks about the things *around* the
> image editor (color calibration, dual monitor, printer matching and
> drivers, etc.) rather than just "Gimp isn't a Photoshop clone so it
> sucks--durrr."
>
I find this bit vastly amusing for some reason:
Linux definitely needs a credible high quality photo retouching
program. Cinepaint has a Ferrari engine inside an old 2CV, while
Gimp has the 2CV engine inside a Ferrari.
--
Always, it comes to cars.
Stewart Stremler
--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list
