Dexter Filmore wrote:
Currently taking part in an MCSE certification training, (yes I know. but LPI C2 doesn't get me a job here. Nothing I can do about it) and situation is as follows: At the facility I got an intel E2140 (that's the crippled Core2Duo with 1MB L2 at 1.60 GHz) with 2GB RAM running Win2003 server. On that VMware WS6, on that a range of VMs sitting on a Samsung sATA, NTFS, nothing fancy. VMs are: Win2003, XP Pro, Vista, BackTrack3/HDinst (had to make myself at home *somehow* :) ) This machine restores 2k3, xp and BT3 *simultaneosly* in 15 seconds to the point when they react to mouse input, another 60 seconds till they are fully loaded. My box at home: AMD Athlon 64 5600+ 2x2.90GHz, 512k L2, 4gigs of RAM, same HDD, /dev/shm mounted,, Kubuntu 8.04 64b and debian etch, VMware WS6, VMs on an xfs partition.

Restoring the 2003 Server alone takes roughly 3 minutes, and it won't react smoothly before that point. I notice a lot of harddisk activity. Both partition and guest OS vmdks are defragmented.
Starting 2 VMs simultaneously is a total mess.
(It used to work a lot better a year ago on Slackware 11 but I don't have that installed anymore, can't compare.)

Anyone got pointers on how to spot the bottleneck? I'll try moving the server VM to another disk tonorrow, I somehow suspect xfs, then again xfs was made for handling large file afair.

How big are the VM's in terms of emulated RAM?

A 1GB virtual machine should take at least 20 seconds *just to read the RAM from disk*.

I would check the VMWare forums.  This question has likely come up there.

I suspect that they heavily optimize the Windows version and just leave the Linux alone once it reaches working.

-a


--
[email protected]
http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-list

Reply via email to