James G. Sack (jim) wrote: > Christopher Smith wrote: > >> .. >> That certainly wouldn't work in C++ 0x. >> .. >> > > Just wondering: In the name above, does the 0x mean anything? > Yes. "C++ 0x" is the next rev of the C++ standard (C89 : C99 :: C++ 98 : C++ 0x). The "x" is supposed to represent the year it is finalized. The joke is that "x should equal 9, but might equal a". ;-)
--Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
