On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 08:43:38PM -0800, David Brown wrote: > Lists are _not_ a primitive type in lisp, like they are in some other > language. Second is not a primitive, (car (cdr x)) is. If you try to > implement using lists instead of pairs, you'll get something very different > than lisp.
Well I'm not sure it would be *that* different visually. I mean...we've gotten *this* far in SICP w/o conses right? Chris -- [email protected] http://www.kernel-panic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/kplug-lpsg
