Also consider this...are there any kr2s's flying with winglets? Winglets have the same structural loading changes as extending the wings.
https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/ https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/parts-for-sale On Aug 20, 2013 5:34 PM, "jon kimmel" <jkimmel50 at gmail.com> wrote: > Strength is not my limiting factor...the @as5048 has about a 25% increase > in strength alone due to the taller spar sections...add on top of that my > spar caps are 10% thicker. > > https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/ > https://sites.google.com/site/mykr2stretch/parts-for-sale > On Aug 20, 2013 5:07 PM, "Larry&Sallie Flesner" <flesner at frontier.com> > wrote: > >> At 07:19 AM 8/18/2013, you wrote: >> >>> ...when I bought the partially complete >>> fuselage the original owner had already done the steps to extend the >>> wings...the stub wing spars are slightly longer...the spar caps are >>> thicker >>> and the spars are longer.. >>> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++**+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> If you want the stock wing length with longer center section, just reduce >> the length of the outer wing panel. I certainly wouldn't go any longer >> then the 2S wings. The extra length of the 2S wing over the 2 reduces the >> design G rating by aprox 1 G as I recall Jeanette saying at one of our >> Gatherings. How accurate that is I can not say. >> >> Larry Flesner >> >> >> ______________________________**_________________ >> Search the KRnet Archives at >> http://tugantek.com/**archmailv2-kr/search<http://tugantek.com/archmailv2-kr/search> >> . >> To UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to KRnet-leave at list.krnet.org >> please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html >> see >> http://list.krnet.org/mailman/**listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org<http://list.krnet.org/mailman/listinfo/krnet_list.krnet.org>to >> change options >> >
