Hi Colin/Bev and others. I am not yet involved building, just 'studying' as a potential project. I have seen the notes re the fuselage construction, but bear in mind that if it deviates from the PFA (our version almost of the EAA) approved design, then the CAA (Cancel Amateur Aviation) would be down like the proverbial 'ton of bricks' . I would have to supply all stress figures, bending forces, the list is endless. You are lucky there Stateside in that you can use your own discretion to a large degree, here we would have to seek out the 'powers to be' even if it were to be painted a different colour almost... Terry Jones. Colin & Bev Rainey wrote:
>Terry > >To help reduce your costs you may want to build the fuselage the way Eduardo >and Dr Dean did out of the spruce frame and glass over foam core. This is the >way all do the wings now, and many are starting to do the fuselage. Some >thoughts for economy without loss of strength. The Vision has been built this >way and is proven to be as strong given same weights. > >Colin & Bev Rainey >KR2(td) N96TA >Sanford, FL >crain...@cfl.rr.com >http://kr-builder.org/Colin/index.html >_______________________________________ >to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net >please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html > > >
