>
> >I figured the area as flat
> >plate of the wing dimensions. Am I doing something wrong or is this
> a
> >case of the spec's not being correct???
>
> Try including the portion of the wing in the fuselage.
>
>
> Larry Severson
> Fountain Valley, CA 92708
> (714) 968-9852
> lar...@socal.rr.com
That would add about 12sq. ft. but I do not picture that as to be
included as wing area. I believed that wing area was that portion of the
aircraft that had an airfoil. If my number would be accurate then wing
loading numbers would increase.
Some how I don't feel like I can be right after all the 78 to 80
sq. ft. number has been used for 30 years.
Thanks - Joe Horton
