Recently I have taken the position to allow others to comment and just read, 
seeing how others have the answers, and my time being short due to the new job. 
However, this one needs a comment...

A point to remember when changing intake manifold designs is what makes what 
kind of power. Long skinny runners with gentle curves make great power in low 
to mid rpms with great throttle response, sacrificing top end power for better 
mid range and beginning rpm response, which is typical of a bone stock car.  
Larger runners with shorter lengths and straight shots to the heads make great 
power mid to high rpm, but suffer badly on the bottom end due to the lack of 
vacuum signal to the carb. Just take a look at a modern ProStock Dragster.  
They are also prone to having fuel vapor linger in the plenum chamber area 
directly below the carb, and then get swept into the next cylinder causing a 
lean rich condition at or near idle rpm.  Sharp corners, drastic changes in 
port sizes from a large plenum, big carbs and large plenums, all hurt 
performance of the chosen parts, and tend to favor just one rpm band neglecting 
the others to produce a narrow range of operation. How many of us are actually 
going to see the rpms that the changes are for: most of us Corvair and VW alike 
stay in the low to midrange rpms all the time, even on takeoff (3000-3500 rpm 
vs. redlines of 5500 to 6000 rpm).

The carb is spaced up from the turn into the head because if the turn is too 
sharp, then the air out runs the gas causing it to puddle in the plenum area 
and then get sucked into the next cylinder, rich lean surge is the result. Also 
oversized carbs tend to make the engine SLOW down at wide open throttle instead 
of speed up due to the carbs ability to give more air than the engine can 
actually use. Consult the Auto Mathbook available at any auto parts store or 
Barnes & Noble, and you can calculate the CFM requirements of your engine 
yourself and see what I mean about carb selection.  Be careful when you begin 
modifying things that 100s of hours on the dyno with way more experienced 
technicians who were being paid to spend 8 hours a day to work out the bugs on 
the engine, and its successive different versions. I don't know any of us that 
have that much free time to experiment, and frankly I want to fly.

Colin Rainey
KSFB
Sanford, FL.

Reply via email to