On 12/2/2011 7:14 PM, Matt Elder wrote: > On 12/2/2011 9:32 AM, Glenn Martin wrote: >> Not RG-58. Too lossy. Use RG-8X instead. > You say too lossy. At the frequencies we run at, what's the difference > in attenuation? > > _______________________________________ > Search the KRnet Archives at http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp > to UNsubscribe from KRnet, send a message to krnet-le...@mylist.net > please see other KRnet info at http://www.krnet.org/info.html The reason I said 58U is that (From what I'd seen online) 58 U foam-core has some of the lowest attenuation of the 'common' cable types (1.7db, IIRC)....
It worked well enough for 10Base2 Ethernet (And yes, I actually have worked with/used 10Base2 in the past... It was simple, and it worked (until 10mbps became too slow))
