April Chin wrote:
> > From: James Carlson <james.d.carlson at sun.com>
> > Roland Mainz writes:
> > > BTW: The "real" fix for this problem is to compile the shell scripts -
> > > in that case the compiled shell script /usr/bin/sleep will just appear
> > > as "just another binary application" in the $ ps -ef # output ...
> > > ... the trouble is that the matching kernel module ("shbinexec") was
> > > added to OS/Net in B106 and we need some builds before we're able to
> > > request a flag day and make the availablity of the kernel module a
> > > requirement... ;-/
> >
> > I'd guess that the flag day is for BFU and not for the build machines
> > themselves: you would need to install at least 106 before BFU-ing any
> > higher.
>
> Isn't the new /bin/shcomp, introduced in build 106,
> needed on the build machines to compile the ksh93 script for sleep?
Erm... yes... "shcomp" would be needed. I hoped we can start using
"shcomp" somewhere around build 110-112 (or better: >= 1-2 months).
> In that case, build 106 would be required for build machines also.
The alternative may simply be to remove the '^' character from the PIT
test until we switch to compiled shell scripts - that would avoid the
whole pain ...
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 3992797
(;O/ \/ \O;)
