Glenn Skinner wrote: > Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 16:19:44 -0700 (PDT) > From: Alan Coopersmith <Alan.Coopersmith at sun.com> > Subject: ksh93 Integration Update 1 Amendments 1 [PSARC/2008/344 > FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008] > > ... > ## Part 1.1: Update of ksh93 > The 1.1 portion of this project is the update of ksh93 from > ast-ksh.2007-12-15 to ast-ksh-2008-05-22 which marks the update > from ksh93 version 's+' to version 't-' (AST/ksh93 uses the > (latin) alphabet for its version number, e.g. version 'a', > version 'b' etc. ; the '+'/'-' means the stabilty status, e.g. > '-' means its "alpha", no suffix means its "stable" (e.g. ready > for production usage) and '+' means its a bugfixed stable version > etc.). > > Are we to infer from this nomenclature description that ksh's > stability level is decreasing as part of this case? > > -- Glenn >
I read it as "we don't integrate '-' versions into Solaris". Did I guess right? - jek3
