On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 20:48:51 PST Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
> Apparently Indiana is all about the expectations of non-Solaris (mostly
> Linux) users,
> as a way to grow the base. Whatever. Some part of the existing base (and
> probably
> a larger part of the _paying_ existing base) just want to keep doing what
> they've
> been doing, give or take a few new features, out until the heat-death of the
> universe who knows how many billion years from now (and boy won't that be fun
> one second past Tue Jan 19 03:14:07 GMT 2038, or earlier, if they fool with
> future
> dates converted at some point to 32-bit time_t).
or a simple
typedef uint32_t time_t;
reserving (time_t)(-1) for error, gets us off the hook
2106-02-07+06:28:14 GMT
