John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 03:49:51AM +0100, Roland Mainz wrote: > > > It's also probably pretty easy to fix (and we'd need the DWARF fix too > > > for when > > > GCC is the primary compiler). As I mentioned to Rich Lowe, I don't > > > remember the > > > vla syntax used by SS11 being in the stabs spec, so we'd need to ask one > > > of the > > > compiler people where the syntax came from and what its spec is. > > > > > > Note that we just need to do a simple parsing of the stab as we throw it > > > away; > > > it's not something that ends up being used in the resultant CTF. > > > > Is there a way to get the patch and land it together as part of the > > ksh93-integration tree ? > > Since a lot of people don't use the nightly -t option, ideally you want the > fix > put back separately sometime before ksh93 lands.
Mhhh, is there no version test which checks whether the tools version matches the minimum version needed by the tree ? > But there's not anybody > working on it ATM, so there is no patch yet. Umpf... that's bad... ;-( ---- Bye, Roland -- __ . . __ (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org \__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer /O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090 (;O/ \/ \O;)
